ROLLICKING REPOST: SO... VINCE THE PRINCE OR FORGETTA-COLLETTA? - Hallo friend TELLING GUIDE FOR CHILDREN, In the article you read this time with the title ROLLICKING REPOST: SO... VINCE THE PRINCE OR FORGETTA-COLLETTA?, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts items ADVENTURE, items ANIMATION, items DREAMS, items IMAGINATION, items LEARNING, items MOTIVATION, we write can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : ROLLICKING REPOST: SO... VINCE THE PRINCE OR FORGETTA-COLLETTA?
link : ROLLICKING REPOST: SO... VINCE THE PRINCE OR FORGETTA-COLLETTA?

ROLLICKING REPOST: SO... VINCE THE PRINCE OR FORGETTA-COLLETTA?

Copyright MARVEL COMICS

VINCE COLLETTA is a name which seems to cause controversy whenever it's mentioned these days.  Some comicbook fans think he was great, others think he was okay, and then there's another group who think he was the worst inker ever to work in the business.

Some JACK KIRBY fans in particular believe he ruined every page of the King's work he ever touched.  Others think he transformed Jack's THOR pages into a tour de force of illustrative brilliance which should grace the Sistine Chapel.  Then there are those poor souls who can't see the difference between one page and another, regardless of whoever pencilled or inked it.

While it's true that Vince's inks may not have suited every artist whose pencils he worked on, there are some whose art was definitely enhanced by the touch of his pen and brush.  (GENE COLAN, JOHN BUSCEMA, and FRANK ROBBINS, to name but three.)  Jack Kirby was definitely on that list.  Vinnie diluted the idiosyncracies and abstractness of Kirby's art, imbuing it with a rugged, realistic quality that perfectly suited the mythical backdrop of Thor's adventures, particularly when set in ASGARD.

I'm not alone in thinking that part of the reason for Colletta's bad rep these days is based on poor quality reprints of his work in various magazines back in the early '70s, printed from proofs in which his fine detailing was lost and clumsily retouched by less-skilled hands.  (Using a blunt felt marker by the looks of things.)

However, back in the late '60s a U.K. publication called FANTASTIC reprinted Thor's adventures from JOURNEY Into MYSTERY, using clear, sharp proofs for near-perfect black and white reproduction. U.S. spellings, colloquialisms and ref-erences were changed, creator credits and corner page numbers were deleted, and open case sound-effects were sometimes blacked-in or cross-hatched for greater impact in the b&w format, but the art still looked great.

It gives me great pleasure to present Vince's inking of Jack's pencils more or less the way they would have looked when they were first completed, as opposed to the far inferior reprints which came later.  Enjoy.   

Click on image, when it appears, click again for optimum size.

Thus Article ROLLICKING REPOST: SO... VINCE THE PRINCE OR FORGETTA-COLLETTA?

that is all articles ROLLICKING REPOST: SO... VINCE THE PRINCE OR FORGETTA-COLLETTA? This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in a post on other articles.

You are now reading the article ROLLICKING REPOST: SO... VINCE THE PRINCE OR FORGETTA-COLLETTA? the link address https://tellingguidefor.blogspot.com/2020/08/rollicking-repost-so-vince-prince-or.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: