Title : WaPo doesn't understand comics 3: This is an editorial cartoon?
link : WaPo doesn't understand comics 3: This is an editorial cartoon?
WaPo doesn't understand comics 3: This is an editorial cartoon?
With all due respect to Ellis Rosen, whom I don't know at all, why is this on the editorial page of the Washington Post. is this a political cartoon? If so what does it mean?
I'm absolutely serious about asking what does it mean. One might have expected to find a cartoon like this in the New Yorker 35 or 40 years ago, but one expected nonsensical comics from them.
The Post made an extremely large mistake by not appointing Ann Telnaes to replace Tom Toles (or Herblock even IMHO), and they continue to compound it by running works like this.
For their home cartoonist, we should have someone that lives here. Michael de Adder is a perfectly competent cartoonist, but he's a Canadian who stayed in Canada and works on a contract. He's not a WaPo employee. To add to the disrespect they show him, the editor runs his cartoons smaller than this one is, and his color cartoons with extensive cross-hatching are run in black and white, so they are extremely muddy and sometimes unreadable. We deserve our own local cartoonist, and one who is treated with respect, in the great tradition of Herblock.
Thus Article WaPo doesn't understand comics 3: This is an editorial cartoon?
that is all articles WaPo doesn't understand comics 3: This is an editorial cartoon? This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in a post on other articles.
You are now reading the article WaPo doesn't understand comics 3: This is an editorial cartoon? the link address https://tellingguidefor.blogspot.com/2023/05/wapo-doesnt-understand-comics-3-this-is.html
0 Response to "WaPo doesn't understand comics 3: This is an editorial cartoon?"
Post a Comment